-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update the governance review template to match the new checklists #749
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ecklist. Update issue template accordingly. Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - suggested changes, asked some questions. these are not required.
Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM thanks, small question.
@@ -23,171 +11,213 @@ Exemplary: project has an extraordinary level of governance development and impl | |||
Satisfactory: project has appropriate governance for its maturity level and is following that governance | |||
Mostly Satisfactory: project has mostly appropriate governance, but needs to fix one or two things | |||
Needs Work: project's governance is lacking and inadequate for its current level of maturity, and needs substantial work to overcome that | |||
|
|||
NOTE: Fill this part as a summary of your review. It is recommended to start from the "Review" section below in the template. | |||
In Crisis: project appears to have several outstanding, critical issues that require attention, clarity, and/or direct guidance from CNCF in order to return to a state of good health and standing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This states "CNCF". Do we need to list the various entities that would need to provide direction? Should this be explicit as to who?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so; this is the template for reviewers, not the public document for projects.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great, thanks for doing this!
I made one suggestion, but it's not anything material.
|
||
### Maintainer List(s) | ||
The project maintains a [listing of subprojects](LINK). This listing appears to be [Very Complete|Mostly Complete|Incomplete]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The project maintains a [listing of subprojects](LINK). This listing appears to be [Very Complete|Mostly Complete|Incomplete]. | |
The project maintains a [listing of subprojects - add link]. This listing appears to be [Very Complete|Mostly Complete|Incomplete]. |
Just a nit. With the way it was formatted it looked like it was already a link, not something that needs to be added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I followed the way we handle links to be filled in for Project Templates.
This is the first part of this cleanup. It updates our governance review template to match the items on the Incubating/Graduating checklist. This lets us review the material supplied by the project directly.
The next part will be finishing the self-assessment guide to match.